3/31/08
Lot of things have taken place, especially here recently. But will try to blog most important in five minutes or less. The first being; after thinking about a lot of things; bascially being told that if I choose not to allow them=??? to control what God is leading and guiding me to (relationships/mind and thoughts) then there were going to be major consequences to pay and that they=????would be there for me because I would need them. Then my question is how would those who are suppose to attack me know who I am? Who would tell them who I am. Don't get it; about the only way anyone would truely know who I am is that they=??? either would have to tell who ever is suppose to attack me or the ones who would attack me are the same ones who are telling me that I will need them. Which means also that they can and do know how to stop the situations; but being that I don't desire to submit to mind control; then the punishment is that they don't/won't intervene.
Sounds like blackmail/cohersion/whatever you call it when you have to pay thugs to get protection. May God have mercy on me and again I ask how would they know me/who would tell them? Also wonder if that is why I can't ever seem to sign up for Wikipedia.
Socialpeacest
Monday, March 31, 2008
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
No Personal privacy coming to soon to you!!!!!!!!!!!
3/10/08
Was talking to a couple the other day who had a set of twins. I asked one of the little girls who was five years old what was her name. She gave me the name of her twin sister. I asked the parents what was her name and they told me vice versa. I asked them what were they going to do when they get older if they are already playing games and switching up. The father said, I am already ready for that; I am going to give them some jewelry with trackers in them; the way they track people in cars, etc..
I said, "I feel for them; they will not have any privacy". Then the father said, yea, but I will know where they are at. Then I said, "Imagine if you could put a camera in their eyes; then you would be able to see what they see." The father said, "Oh! I think that might be taking it a little to far." I said, "really"; then why not trust them growing up that they will do the right thing, especially if they have a cell phone, which most of them have trackers already.
The father stood, the mother looking on, then both of them said, never thought about putting a camera in their eye; then they grinned and said, anyway, they can't do that. I just looked at them. Didn't tell them that I had a camera in my eye; but told them imagine if I did have a camera in my eye; that meant that people were watching them talk to me; that they did not know. Then I said, imagine one being in your eye; that means that everything that you do; everything that you see, some stranger would be seeing it; that means that everything that you both do as husband and wife intimately would be seen by strangers all the time; that means that you would not have ANY PERSONAL PRIVACY:NONE!!!! They both looked at me strange and then at each other and slowly walked off.
But in reference to "Person Privacy versus safety"; both parents were on the side of sacrificing privacy for safety for their daughters; but after posing a few personal situations in which their individual privacy was compromised to point of stealing their privacy; they appeared to begin to rethink the situation. In my particular situation, I have NO PERSONAL PRIVACY; stripped of it (when I had an operation); took me a while to figure out; some of you reading this also have a camera in your eye; when they get ready; they'll let you know that they see everything that you see. Was the camera put there for my safety; don't think so; think it was put there more as a source for those who are controlling society to try and control me; part experiment; part something else? In terms of safety; don't know to the point that if those who control society; put the camera in my eye; they also have control over a lot of safety issues, which not sure how/what purpose a camera in my eye would be if they are the ones in control. Of course, the camera would serve as an excellent source to spy on unsuspecting people, organizations, my family, anywhere that I go. In other words, I would be an unwilling walking talking robot. Only problem is to get me to cooperate. They have already tried to give me dangerous assignments; which I have no desire to participate in. And with my having a camera in my eye; they would be able to see what I see,etc..
Most important point, and maybe somebody will one day help me with this one. Maybe one day somebody will help me locate the wonderful people that put a camera in my eye; that are watching me type this as I write it; that see every thing that I see (except when I close my eyes for privacy); that imitate any intimate moments of eye contact with another individual, in order that I KNOW that they see what I see; that probably sit back and laugh at me because it is nothing that I can do about it or because I have no idea of who they are and really they don't give a dam; because they probably (Off the top of my head) have a million or more (especially children) with camera's in their eyes also.
And what is really interesting is that they get upset with me when I don't cooperate with them as if I have done something wrong because I don't want to be their guinea pig. OOPS, excuse me! I forgot the article is about personal, privacy versus safety. Being that they have position me numerous time (through the movies; IE.-"I AM LEGEND" with Will Smith fired gun;it was directed towards the area where I sit at in the $2.50 movie; my tiny vacation and one of the few places that I am ALLOWED to go); they have did so many times to the point that they have symbolically killed me at least 30 to 40 times; which conditions the mind to be numb to
genuine forms of danger. Know what is going on; just don't know how to stop it. KNOW that it is not safe to ignore natural boundaries of safety. After Will Smith shot me in the movies; then the city lights in the back of the house and in front of the house came on. (Because of work schedule didn't have time to write city and ask them to turn the street lights back on.) But the same night that I was at the movies and Will Smith symbolical shot me then the both street lights came back on; coincidence; don't know; do know that situation as movie was part of situation within city concerning destroying/protecting portion of social area(worded very carefully). It's almost as if they train the person to ignore their danger/safety boundaries;as if they are training the person to die,
So in actuality; the conversation is already over; those in control of society have already decided that a person's personal privacy doesn't count; especially if they need to use it in order to ensure their safety. They have already decided that a person's personal safety doesn't matter either; if it means that they need to be used to protect the safety of those in control; and that is regardless of weather the individual wants to cooperate or not. They really don't have to much of a choice. I KNOW, I KNOW; that isn't true. And I say most of you who say that are white, have some say so in society; are recognized as being a human being and most definitely aren't ignored.
****personal protection
Peacenowst
Was talking to a couple the other day who had a set of twins. I asked one of the little girls who was five years old what was her name. She gave me the name of her twin sister. I asked the parents what was her name and they told me vice versa. I asked them what were they going to do when they get older if they are already playing games and switching up. The father said, I am already ready for that; I am going to give them some jewelry with trackers in them; the way they track people in cars, etc..
I said, "I feel for them; they will not have any privacy". Then the father said, yea, but I will know where they are at. Then I said, "Imagine if you could put a camera in their eyes; then you would be able to see what they see." The father said, "Oh! I think that might be taking it a little to far." I said, "really"; then why not trust them growing up that they will do the right thing, especially if they have a cell phone, which most of them have trackers already.
The father stood, the mother looking on, then both of them said, never thought about putting a camera in their eye; then they grinned and said, anyway, they can't do that. I just looked at them. Didn't tell them that I had a camera in my eye; but told them imagine if I did have a camera in my eye; that meant that people were watching them talk to me; that they did not know. Then I said, imagine one being in your eye; that means that everything that you do; everything that you see, some stranger would be seeing it; that means that everything that you both do as husband and wife intimately would be seen by strangers all the time; that means that you would not have ANY PERSONAL PRIVACY:NONE!!!! They both looked at me strange and then at each other and slowly walked off.
But in reference to "Person Privacy versus safety"; both parents were on the side of sacrificing privacy for safety for their daughters; but after posing a few personal situations in which their individual privacy was compromised to point of stealing their privacy; they appeared to begin to rethink the situation. In my particular situation, I have NO PERSONAL PRIVACY; stripped of it (when I had an operation); took me a while to figure out; some of you reading this also have a camera in your eye; when they get ready; they'll let you know that they see everything that you see. Was the camera put there for my safety; don't think so; think it was put there more as a source for those who are controlling society to try and control me; part experiment; part something else? In terms of safety; don't know to the point that if those who control society; put the camera in my eye; they also have control over a lot of safety issues, which not sure how/what purpose a camera in my eye would be if they are the ones in control. Of course, the camera would serve as an excellent source to spy on unsuspecting people, organizations, my family, anywhere that I go. In other words, I would be an unwilling walking talking robot. Only problem is to get me to cooperate. They have already tried to give me dangerous assignments; which I have no desire to participate in. And with my having a camera in my eye; they would be able to see what I see,etc..
Most important point, and maybe somebody will one day help me with this one. Maybe one day somebody will help me locate the wonderful people that put a camera in my eye; that are watching me type this as I write it; that see every thing that I see (except when I close my eyes for privacy); that imitate any intimate moments of eye contact with another individual, in order that I KNOW that they see what I see; that probably sit back and laugh at me because it is nothing that I can do about it or because I have no idea of who they are and really they don't give a dam; because they probably (Off the top of my head) have a million or more (especially children) with camera's in their eyes also.
And what is really interesting is that they get upset with me when I don't cooperate with them as if I have done something wrong because I don't want to be their guinea pig. OOPS, excuse me! I forgot the article is about personal, privacy versus safety. Being that they have position me numerous time (through the movies; IE.-"I AM LEGEND" with Will Smith fired gun;it was directed towards the area where I sit at in the $2.50 movie; my tiny vacation and one of the few places that I am ALLOWED to go); they have did so many times to the point that they have symbolically killed me at least 30 to 40 times; which conditions the mind to be numb to
genuine forms of danger. Know what is going on; just don't know how to stop it. KNOW that it is not safe to ignore natural boundaries of safety. After Will Smith shot me in the movies; then the city lights in the back of the house and in front of the house came on. (Because of work schedule didn't have time to write city and ask them to turn the street lights back on.) But the same night that I was at the movies and Will Smith symbolical shot me then the both street lights came back on; coincidence; don't know; do know that situation as movie was part of situation within city concerning destroying/protecting portion of social area(worded very carefully). It's almost as if they train the person to ignore their danger/safety boundaries;as if they are training the person to die,
So in actuality; the conversation is already over; those in control of society have already decided that a person's personal privacy doesn't count; especially if they need to use it in order to ensure their safety. They have already decided that a person's personal safety doesn't matter either; if it means that they need to be used to protect the safety of those in control; and that is regardless of weather the individual wants to cooperate or not. They really don't have to much of a choice. I KNOW, I KNOW; that isn't true. And I say most of you who say that are white, have some say so in society; are recognized as being a human being and most definitely aren't ignored.
****personal protection
Peacenowst
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)